Accepting Editor

In the Journal of Global Engineering Review (JGER), all submitted manuscripts are assigned to a qualified Accepting Editor, who is responsible for overseeing the peer review process, ensuring the integrity and quality of the review, and making the final recommendation regarding acceptance for publication. This system ensures that each manuscript is evaluated fairly and rigorously by experts with appropriate disciplinary knowledge.

Role of the Accepting Editor
The Accepting Editor has several key responsibilities, including:

  1. Manuscript Evaluation: Assessing the suitability of the manuscript for the journal’s scope and standards before initiating peer review.
  2. Peer Review Oversight: Selecting qualified reviewers with relevant expertise, managing the review process, and ensuring timely and constructive feedback.
  3. Decision-Making: Considering reviewers’ reports, providing recommendations for revision or acceptance, and making the final editorial decision in accordance with the journal’s policies.
  4. Quality Assurance: Ensuring that accepted manuscripts meet the journal’s standards for scientific rigor, clarity, originality, and ethical compliance.

Selection of Accepting Editors

  • Accepting Editors are selected from the journal’s Editorial Board based on their expertise, research experience, and contributions to the field of engineering.
  • Editors may specialize in specific engineering disciplines, enabling them to handle manuscripts in their areas of expertise effectively.
  • The journal may appoint additional subject-matter experts as guest editors for interdisciplinary or emerging research topics.

Conflict of Interest Policy

  • Accepting Editors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest with submitted manuscripts.
  • Editors who have a personal, professional, or financial interest in a submission recuse themselves from handling that manuscript to ensure unbiased review and decision-making.

Transparency and Accountability
JGER is committed to maintaining transparency in editorial decisions. Authors are informed of the assigned Accepting Editor, and all decisions are supported by detailed peer review reports. This approach fosters trust, maintains academic integrity, and upholds the journal’s commitment to high-quality, multidisciplinary engineering research.